Federal Judge Rules Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli’s Appointment is Unlawful
A federal judge has ruled that Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli is “not lawfully serving” in his position, but declined to dismiss criminal indictments that were challenged by defense attorneys over his status. Senior U.S. District Judge J. Michael Seabright of Hawaii made the ruling, stating that Essayli “unlawfully assumed the role of Acting United States Attorney” in July. However, Seabright also noted that Essayli can remain in charge under a different title, as he “remains the First Assistant United States Attorney” and can “perform the functions and duties of that office” even if he is forced to shed his “acting” designation.
Background and Challenges to Essayli’s Appointment
Essayli, a former Riverside County assemblyman, was appointed as the region’s interim top federal prosecutor by U.S. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi in April. The top prosecutors in charge of U.S. attorney’s offices are supposed to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate or a panel of federal judges. However, the Trump administration has circumvented the normal process, allowing Essayli and others to remain on the job without facing a vote. Essayli’s temporary appointment was set to expire in late July, but the White House used an unprecedented legal maneuver to shift his title to “acting,” extending his term for an additional nine months.
Challenges and Rulings
Challenges to Essayli’s appointment were brought in at least three criminal cases, with defense lawyers arguing that charges brought under his watch are invalid. The federal public defender’s office in Los Angeles asked the judge to disqualify Essayli from participating in and supervising criminal prosecutions in the district. Seabright shared the concerns of federal public defenders but noted that there had been no showing that Essayli’s supervision in the acting role had “improperly interfered with the grand jury process or led to any other specific actions that prejudiced Defendants.” He ruled that although Essayli could not continue to be the acting U.S. attorney, he could perform the lawful duties of first assistant U.S. attorney, including supervising prosecutions.
Similar Challenges Across the Country
Seabright’s ruling comes amid similar challenges to the Trump administration’s tactics for installing loyalists who wield the power to bring criminal charges and sue on the government’s behalf. A federal judge in August determined that Alina Habba has been illegally occupying the U.S. attorney post in New Jersey, although that order was put on hold pending appeal. Last month, a federal judge disqualified Nevada’s top federal prosecutor, Sigal Chattah, from several cases, concluding she “is not validly serving as acting U.S. attorney.” James Comey, the former FBI director charged with lying to Congress, cited the Nevada and New Jersey cases in a recent filing, and is now challenging the legality of Trump’s appointment of Lindsey Halligan as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Conclusion and References
Seabright’s ruling highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding the Trump administration’s appointments of U.S. attorneys. Essayli’s tenure has sparked discord in the office, with dozens of career DOJ prosecutors quitting. For more information on this topic, please refer to the original article Here.
Image Source: www.latimes.com
